DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Discussions concerning land access, DOC legislation and 4wd regulations
Post Reply
PeterVahry
Hard Yaka
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Auckland

DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by PeterVahry »

http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/news/176

The Department of Conservation are planning to review their 4x4 pamphlets. They are working with the NZFWDA on this, but the NZFWDA are also interested to hear of any corrections or additions from the 4x4 community in general.

Let's see if we can help them get it right this time!
User avatar
DieselBoy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 4568
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:00 pm

Re: DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by DieselBoy »

I notice the Waitawheta track is not mentioned???

Is that not on DOC land??
lax2wlg wrote:Is that like saying 'she's hot, for a crackwhore??
PeterVahry
Hard Yaka
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by PeterVahry »

Part of that route is on DOC land and part is unformed legal road. It's actually in the BoP conservancy and we may need to wait to see what their CMS says about 4WD use. All the public hearings etc on the BoP CMS are completed and DOC have to have the final version approved by the NZ Conservation Authority.

The other question is... do we want every route to be available to the general public, or are there some that are likely to be just too difficult to manage 4x4 use of? If such a route is listed and Joe Public keeps getting stuck etc then there may be just negative publicity.

My opinion is to have DOC list only those 4x4 routes that will tolerate use by the general public.

Peter
User avatar
DieselBoy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 4568
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:00 pm

Re: DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by DieselBoy »

PeterVahry wrote:The other question is... do we want every route to be available to the general public, or are there some that are likely to be just too difficult to manage 4x4 use of? If such a route is listed and Joe Public keeps getting stuck etc then there may be just negative publicity.

My opinion is to have DOC list only those 4x4 routes that will tolerate use by the general public.

Peter


Thats a very good point.

Provided that it wouldn't come back to bite us in the future as it has never been document as being a vehicle route??
lax2wlg wrote:Is that like saying 'she's hot, for a crackwhore??
Bubba
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1742
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Wellington

Re: DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by Bubba »

DieselBoy wrote:
PeterVahry wrote:The other question is... do we want every route to be available to the general public, or are there some that are likely to be just too difficult to manage 4x4 use of? If such a route is listed and Joe Public keeps getting stuck etc then there may be just negative publicity.

My opinion is to have DOC list only those 4x4 routes that will tolerate use by the general public.

Peter


Thats a very good point.

Provided that it wouldn't come back to bite us in the future as it has never been document as being a vehicle route??


I agree with Diesel, good idea but how can we be sure that they will honour what they say now, in 5, 10 years
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
PeterVahry
Hard Yaka
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: DOC to review 4x4 visitor pamphlets

Post by PeterVahry »

If a DOC CMS includes reference to a 4x4 route or makes allowance for such places in the future then that's the best we can do. It will be up to four wheelers to keep to our side of the deals too and keep 4x4 routes sustainable. That's why it may not be wise to put every trail as being for the general public. It's going to take us and any partners like DOC, a while to define standards and conform to them.
Post Reply

Return to “Land Access / DOC legislation / Regulations”