I bet you cant tell me what axles its running are
Awesome articulation from series rover
Awesome articulation from series rover
http://au.msnusers.com/wildfingsphotos/shoebox.msnw
I bet you cant tell me what axles its running are
I bet you cant tell me what axles its running are
- mike
- Last minute Mike
- Posts: 3545
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 12:00 pm
- Location: Christchurch - The place I'd like to be
I really like this pic. He stole my paint job
For that I'll try to steal his articulation just need to figure out how first :scratch:
http://au.msnusers.com/wildfingsphotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=4
Mike
http://au.msnusers.com/wildfingsphotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=4
Mike
Last edited by mike on Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1973 SWB Land Rover V8 Hybrid
1994 Toyota Surf
1994 Toyota Surf
rover flex
did a crop and lighten, has portals , shocks, but couldn't see springs under there,
if I could throw in my two cents worth to reply to those who question the strength of Volvos. Generally the weakest link on most built 4x4's on conventional axles is the CV joint. The CV's on Toyota 45"s ,Hilux's, GQ Nissans, early Rangeys and 110 Landys are all identical in size.Eg. You can remove the balls and spiders from a range rover cv and fit it into a toyota one. only the heat treatment and the splines vary from one brand of vehicle to another. The volvo front axle has identical size cv's to all these vehicles but because of hub reduction there is only half the stress.
Before I converted my Landrover to portals I used to run Salisbury (read Dana 60 ) axles front and back, but I built the front end to take LandRover swivel housings and Toyota CV joints. After shattering several cv's I concluded that unless I could find and adapt much larger ones the front diff was overkill and only ate up valuable ground clearance. I could not afford Volvo axles at that time ( still can't ) so I built my own portal hubs for Range rover diffs , also fitted with Toyota cv's and I have not had a problem since. So what I am getting at is that it does not matter how big and strong you may think your Nissan or Toyota etc diffs are , You are still limited by the strength of the CV's. Yes i know about Marfields and Long fields, but you can put them on Volvos too and they will still be effectively more than twice as strong as a Toyota or Nissan with similar equipment. Given enough engine, enough tire and too much right foot you can break anything, with the possible exception of Mogs, but I have heard of them blowing the portal boxes because they use helical gears instead of straight cuts. This surprises me a little because a 404 Mog with all the optional crawler gears is reputadely capable of reliably towing something like 900 tons when used as a railway locomotive.
Bill aka daddylonglegs from outerlimits has built some pretty trick landys in the past
turoa wrote:any other guesses before I reveal my answer (and eat teh pie myself)
I like mince and cheese
Ben sort of guessed it though.......
Last edited by lilpigzuk on Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Right. I'm here to collect my pie... but it looks like Rex beat me to it.
Home made, built by Bill Van Snorkle, aka Daddylonglegs, aka Portalrover
http://forums.lr4x4.com/index.php?s=eb7 ... =6428&st=0
Ben
Home made, built by Bill Van Snorkle, aka Daddylonglegs, aka Portalrover
http://forums.lr4x4.com/index.php?s=eb7 ... =6428&st=0
Ben
Would have to be one of the coolest Landys around.....
It also ran an idea of Bills "forced articulation" Was featured in a 4wd monthly a couple of years back. Quite a cool idea. Basically "forced" the front axle to flex like the back axle (in a crossaxled situation) therefore the body would only tilt half of axle angle.....
hard to explain.
It also ran an idea of Bills "forced articulation" Was featured in a 4wd monthly a couple of years back. Quite a cool idea. Basically "forced" the front axle to flex like the back axle (in a crossaxled situation) therefore the body would only tilt half of axle angle.....
I apologise for the quick interuption
, but you landie/rangie guys(thinking of Mike, furgus etc etc) could be interested in a rangie on TM in Hams (search and ye shall find - too easy to post link
). Its on my watch list but I probably wont buy, but its got a bit of good fruit that could be robbed if you break it down 
- mroffroader
- Hard Yaka
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:00 pm
- Location: Lower Hutt WELLINGTON :D
- Contact:
lilpigzuk wrote:Would have to be one of the coolest Landys around.....
It also ran an idea of Bills "forced articulation" Was featured in a 4wd monthly a couple of years back. Quite a cool idea. Basically "forced" the front axle to flex like the back axle (in a crossaxled situation) therefore the body would only tilt half of axle angle.....hard to explain.
It was basically a shaft connected to the rear housing that came halfway up the truck and had a gear on it. The front axle had the same sort of shaft attached that ran back down to the same place with another gear on it. The two gears intermesh so that when one shaft twists with the axle it turns the opposing gear, forcing the other axle to be twisted in the opposite way.
I think he used a modified transfer case to do the 'gear' bit in the middle.
Damn, homebuilts huh?.. Like the ones I've been building in my head for the last year or so to bolt onto Toy axles
Steve
VW Combi
Cheers Reece

