WOF Regulations

Garage talk. Anything from mounting a winch to water proofing the electrics.
Post Reply
User avatar
mudzuki
Bush Crasher
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:51 pm
Location: Horopito, Central North Island

WOF Regulations

Post by mudzuki »

The full WOF manual has gone online

http://vehicleinspection.nzta.govt.nz/virms/in-service-wof/general

Exactly what the inspectors use
Might be a handy refrence before any future mods
User avatar
wjw
Hard Yaka
Posts: 3420
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch
Contact:

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by wjw »

8)
-----------------------
Who knew Prados could fly?
User avatar
coxsy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 5200
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: mangere auckland

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by coxsy »

think i can't get passed the 50mm increase in height :D
89 safari, pto winch, 33x15 simexs. sliders,75mm lift . turbo intercoolered
User avatar
Dirtydog
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Gore, Southland

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by Dirtydog »

cheers dude gunna be handy for cert
User avatar
snotgoblin
Hard Yaka
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Blenheim

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by snotgoblin »

Not sure I like these statements in relation to section 3-1 Structure;

f) any corrosion that the inspector considers has caused weakening of a load-bearing structure (Note 6), or

g) poor repairs that have not returned the structure to within a safe tolerance of when it was manufactured (Note 3) (Note 6), eg:

i. filler has been used in an attempt to conceal corrosion damage or deformation of a component

ii. a high strength steel component has been heated

iii. a component has been strengthened.

How many WOF inspectors you know have the ability to structurally analyse a vehicle to determine if the structural integrity has been altered from the design integrity?

Not sure how many manufacturers will provide material specs and design loadings without claiming Commercial-in-Confidence or something...
evilknieval69
Bush Crasher
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:38 pm

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by evilknieval69 »

If a wof inspector is unsure on something like that then they are to withhold the wof, (not fail it, but not pass it) until further information can be sought, ie. ask a panel beater.
User avatar
snotgoblin
Hard Yaka
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Blenheim

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by snotgoblin »

Reading some other sections it seems that a fair bit of the subjectivity has been removed. So there is less room for interpretation, which I think is good for all concerned.
User avatar
Bonus
Bush Crasher
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by Bonus »

So if im reading this right I should NOT have been failed today due to my 50mm lift springs in the back of my terrano,as the following applies to me...

the springs or shock absorbers are direct replacements, and
replacement springs are contained within unmodified OE seats throughout full suspension travel, and
replacement springs are self-retaining in their seats at full extension, without the use of non-standard devices such as wire-ties, straps, or external spring locators, and
replacement springs have not been heated or cut, and
springs and spring seats are not height adjustable (unless OE), and
replacement shock absorbers, including air-adjustable units, fit unmodified OE mountings, and
suspension maintains sufficient travel for safe operation when fully laden, and
suspension components maintain sufficient clearance from unmodified bumpstops when fully laden, and
a minimum of 100 mm ground clearance (unladen and without driver) exists below any part of the vehicle structure, or any steering, braking or suspension component2, and
the normal relationship between front and rear suspension height is not unduly affected.
User avatar
Crash bandicoot
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2924
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:19 pm
Location: Towing a hilux

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by Crash bandicoot »

Bonus wrote:So if im reading this right I should NOT have been failed today due to my 50mm lift springs in the back of my terrano,as the following applies to me...

the springs or shock absorbers are direct replacements, and
replacement springs are contained within unmodified OE seats throughout full suspension travel, and
replacement springs are self-retaining in their seats at full extension, without the use of non-standard devices such as wire-ties, straps, or external spring locators, and
replacement springs have not been heated or cut, and
springs and spring seats are not height adjustable (unless OE), and
replacement shock absorbers, including air-adjustable units, fit unmodified OE mountings, and
suspension maintains sufficient travel for safe operation when fully laden, and
suspension components maintain sufficient clearance from unmodified bumpstops when fully laden, and
a minimum of 100 mm ground clearance (unladen and without driver) exists below any part of the vehicle structure, or any steering, braking or suspension component2, and
the normal relationship between front and rear suspension height is not unduly affected.


and whats the margin of error, who is to say you didn't intentionally lift it 49mm?
Waiter...there is a drought in my glass.
User avatar
Bonus
Bush Crasher
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by Bonus »

Crash bandicoot wrote:
Bonus wrote:So if im reading this right I should NOT have been failed today due to my 50mm lift springs in the back of my terrano,as the following applies to me...

the springs or shock absorbers are direct replacements, and
replacement springs are contained within unmodified OE seats throughout full suspension travel, and
replacement springs are self-retaining in their seats at full extension, without the use of non-standard devices such as wire-ties, straps, or external spring locators, and
replacement springs have not been heated or cut, and
springs and spring seats are not height adjustable (unless OE), and
replacement shock absorbers, including air-adjustable units, fit unmodified OE mountings, and
suspension maintains sufficient travel for safe operation when fully laden, and
suspension components maintain sufficient clearance from unmodified bumpstops when fully laden, and
a minimum of 100 mm ground clearance (unladen and without driver) exists below any part of the vehicle structure, or any steering, braking or suspension component2, and
the normal relationship between front and rear suspension height is not unduly affected.


and whats the margin of error, who is to say you didn't intentionally lift it 49mm?


I reckon its the wof guys "eyecrometre"
User avatar
Dirtydog
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Gore, Southland

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by Dirtydog »

just chuck some sagging ones in it that dont clear the bumpstops....

then ask him how he passed it.
User avatar
crazyclark31
Hard Yaka
Posts: 867
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:13 pm
Location: invercargill.

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by crazyclark31 »

no were does it say about 50mm lift or any lift for coil springs.
The 50mm lift is for the blocks used for leaf springs.
The way its written to me says that as long as the springs fit straight in and remain tightly seated through the full cycle and at full extenstion with no modifications then they are fine.

the springs or shock absorbers are direct replacements, and
replacement springs are contained within unmodified OE seats throughout full suspension travel, and
replacement springs are self-retaining in their seats at full extension, without the use of non-standard devices such as wire-ties, straps, or external spring locators, and
replacement springs have not been heated or cut, and
springs and spring seats are not height adjustable (unless OE), and
replacement shock absorbers, including air-adjustable units, fit unmodified OE mountings, and
suspension maintains sufficient travel for safe operation when fully laden, and
suspension components maintain sufficient clearance from unmodified bumpstops when fully laden, and
a minimum of 100 mm ground clearance (unladen and without driver) exists below any part of the vehicle structure, or any steering, braking or suspension component2, and
the normal relationship between front and rear suspension height is not unduly affected.
User avatar
tallsam66
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by tallsam66 »

Got to agree ....your spring lift should be fine.

crazyclark31 wrote:no were does it say about 50mm lift or any lift for coil springs.
The 50mm lift is for the blocks used for leaf springs.
The way its written to me says that as long as the springs fit straight in and remain tightly seated through the full cycle and at full extenstion with no modifications then they are fine.

the springs or shock absorbers are direct replacements, and
replacement springs are contained within unmodified OE seats throughout full suspension travel, and
replacement springs are self-retaining in their seats at full extension, without the use of non-standard devices such as wire-ties, straps, or external spring locators, and
replacement springs have not been heated or cut, and
springs and spring seats are not height adjustable (unless OE), and
replacement shock absorbers, including air-adjustable units, fit unmodified OE mountings, and
suspension maintains sufficient travel for safe operation when fully laden, and
suspension components maintain sufficient clearance from unmodified bumpstops when fully laden, and
a minimum of 100 mm ground clearance (unladen and without driver) exists below any part of the vehicle structure, or any steering, braking or suspension component2, and
the normal relationship between front and rear suspension height is not unduly affected.
silveradoman
Bush Crasher
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:19 am

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by silveradoman »

so what will this mean to our bullbar fitment?
where it states not to slope forward.
the bar i was going to build leans forward like the baja comp trucks.
it wouldn't look to good at at 90 degrees standing vertical.
looks like this ->
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc91 ... prerun.jpg
User avatar
tallsam66
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by tallsam66 »

Fail unless you have it certed.

silveradoman wrote:so what will this mean to our bullbar fitment?
where it states not to slope forward.
the bar i was going to build leans forward like the baja comp trucks.
it wouldn't look to good at at 90 degrees standing vertical.
looks like this ->
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc91 ... prerun.jpg
silveradoman
Bush Crasher
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:19 am

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by silveradoman »

yea that's lame a.
whats the difference between that and an arb bar (impact wise ) or the old fj45 railway irons
User avatar
tallsam66
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: WOF Regulations

Post by tallsam66 »

Re Bulllbar sloping forward ..it not allowed

See
2-1 External projections

c, slopes forward, unless this is necessary to fit the contours of the vehicle

yours slopes forward ...FAIL.
Post Reply

Return to “Tool Shed”