Mudde1 wrote:
Not sure if you were at the LROCA meeting that I addressed last year but there are several points that you need to be aware of. Should there be a fire in a forest when you are in the forest, you will most likely be held personally libel for the costs of fighting that fire, even if it is not proved that you started it. That could easily cost you $1,000,000. And if you think it want happen, it has already happened to a group of hunters from Wellington about five years ago. They went out for a hunt, and ended up as bankrupts. Should the same thing happen when you are on a LROCA trip, NZFWDA insurance will supply a lawyer and cover the costs involved.
Also if the trip causes other damage and a claim for is made against you, you will most likely be personally libel. Again LROCA and other NZFWDA clubs have this covered. It is very unlikely that you vehicle insurance or house hold insurance will cover this. Ask your insurance company if your insurance covers rural fires Act claims. I know that LROCA exec has had very good legal advice on these points and are now a very very strong supporter of NZFWDA insurance for this very reason. You are correct it is no different if it is a group of mates or a organized club, the rules and risks are the same and many people out there don't realize what they are getting themselves into. The difference between a club and an individual is that if properly organized, a club can protect themselves against some of these risks. It is much much harder for an individual. I am happy to visit clubs, members or not, and explain the details.
Tony Burgess
President, New Zealand Four Wheel Drive Association.(NZFWDA)
Thanks for chiming in Tony. But I'm a little confused about all the fuss. In all seriousness is is not OK for a group of mates to loosely call themselves a 'club'.
I mean, for example, me and two of my mates go and drive Thompsons Track.....just for fun, like a lot of us do regularly. It's just a few trucks legitimately using land that's designated for that use. Is it any different if me and those same two mates go out and drive Thompson's....but we are now calling ourselves a 'club'.
Obviously we're not a proper 4wd club with a membership list and fees and president etc. Of course, I'm still a paying member of the NZFWDA through the LROCA. It's kind of just a tounge-in-cheek play on words. My attempt at a little irony. I mean, Grey Lynn Offroad!?!? haha.
If it's upsetting to anyone, or not appropriate, I'll of course make up an equally silly name like 'Mt Eden Extreme Mud PLuggers' or something like that. But is it really an issue? Or are we just getting our knickers in a twist because it might appear that my 'club' is somehow giving a bad name to the established organized clubs.
A club is a group of like-minded individuals. If I can't organize a beach drive through my 'club' facebook page....I suppose I'll just contintue to text my mates and head out for a drive together that way.
I'm confused at to what the issue is here? Use of the word 'club'. Going for a drive with more than one person? Do we all need to be incorporated fee paying structures even when we go for a drive in the forest with our mates?
Cheers
Alex