easy solution is to not pay registration, only a small fine if you get stopped and no fine if you don't
how often do you get pulled up on a bike???? I can see alot of bikers going this way and I wouldnt blame them!
easy solution is to not pay registration, only a small fine if you get stopped and no fine if you don't
rangimotors wrote:one of the problems i see with it is that motor bikes can be one of those leasure activity items like a hotrod, 4wd etc etc Why is it that if i have 2 cars a 4wd and 2 motor bikes that i pay rego for all of them including acc levies? Surley I can only use one at a time so why am i paying so much more acc?
Lets say i was a bike collector and had 10 bikes and only ride one once a week, is it really fear for me to be paying 10 times more acc than someone who has one bike and rides it everyday? Surely the everyday rider is more at risk. Perhaps it should be charged perperson rather than per motor vechicle.
coop wrote:pfft, a fine for not having a rego is 200 bux. Chuck it on hold is a no brainer. I'd have more of a chance of winning lotto powerball than a cop in a commodore trying to catch me on my 160hp gixxer.
coop wrote:pfft, a fine for not having a rego is 200 bux. Chuck it on hold is a no brainer. I'd have more of a chance of winning lotto powerball than a cop in a commodore trying to catch me on my 160hp gixxer.
Bubba wrote:coop wrote:pfft, a fine for not having a rego is 200 bux. Chuck it on hold is a no brainer. I'd have more of a chance of winning lotto powerball than a cop in a commodore trying to catch me on my 160hp gixxer.
Darwin nomination for you.
Read you statement again.... Doesn't do a lot for the argument of bike riders being safe and the issue being others on the road, or any other vaild argument for that matter. It is my expirence people that make statements of that kind are all blame, no responsibility.