Page 2 of 2

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:04 am
by petefj40
This is how it looks down the scope @10m on the lowest settings on the Bushnell Elite 3200. I love the width of the crosshairs and the mill dots. I prefer these crosshairs/mill dots to the more expensive Nikon scope.
Anyone have any pix of how there scope looks from the same view?

Image

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:13 am
by wopass
Norton cd case at 20m and holding camera in hand with rifle sitting on bush sack ontop of engine stand in garage so not the clearest :lol:

Peloi 4-16x50 Ranger

Image

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:25 am
by petefj40
Interesting seeing the differences. Cheers wopass.
I'll throw up a pic of the Nikon later. Cross hairs are thicker. Not so good for aiming up wee bunnies at over 100m.

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:52 pm
by wopass
ohh thats on 12 power to :wink:

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:57 pm
by petefj40
Cool. :D

The first pic isn't to clear. But you get an idear how the crosshairs look. A little on the think side I recon.

Image
Image
Image

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:45 pm
by tui_man2
mickey wrote:if you've got a visa, import one from the states and save a few hundred bucks.
http://www.theopticzone.com/



iv imported a cuple for them easy to deal with as in a leupold man as they are prety good for the price an have good warenty to go with them have a 4.5-14x50 on 3 of my guns an are mint with the b/c also for the longer shots with the 300wsm an 7mm wsm

Re: Scope magnification question

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:53 pm
by gonfellon
lol i got a 4x40 nikko stirling and it out proforms most top brands ive seen and used i think look through them before you buy. name mean not much its all on if you a good shot or not