1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

For all Mitsubisih related topics

Post Reply
xijlix94
Stropper
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:56 pm

1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by xijlix94 »

Hi Guys,
I am looking to buy a pajero and found these two cars, one petrol on diesel, can you please advise which one to buy, details as follows:

Both cost $3500 and both are 1994 year model

3.5 V6, 160000km, swb DOCH twin cam

2.8 TD, 220000km, lwb

Thank you.

Jerry
User avatar
NJV6
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2751
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Southland

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by NJV6 »

Depends if you want a 2 door or a 4 door!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thats the easy part...
SWB V6 Paj with one or two mods ;)
xijlix94
Stropper
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:56 pm

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by xijlix94 »

NJV6 wrote:Depends if you want a 2 door or a 4 door!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thats the easy part...

I am fine with either 2dr or 4dr. Just the two engine, from their performance, durability, comfort, off road ability and value for money? which one is better?

Thanks
User avatar
pjb
Hard Yaka
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:37 am
Location: North Shore City

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by pjb »

Both these motors are good. Buy whichever one is in better condition... The petrol is heavy on the fuel.
94 Pajero SWB, 3.5 V6
xijlix94
Stropper
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:56 pm

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by xijlix94 »

pjb wrote:Both these motors are good. Buy whichever one is in better condition... The petrol is heavy on the fuel.

I dont really care about the fuel cost, because it is overrall will be even, Diesel in NZ have on road cost.

By the on and off road performance and handling, which one is better?
User avatar
NJV6
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2751
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Southland

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by NJV6 »

:lol:



:lol:



153KW vs 92KW

Petrol for performance, as PJB said though, expensive to run... Overall it is not even.
SWB V6 Paj with one or two mods ;)
User avatar
Stevo Magic
Winch master
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 10:25 am

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by Stevo Magic »

Just to add an opinion - if money is not an issue for you then I would take the petrol every time, especially with the lower mileage. As suggested, even with RUC's the diesel is likely to be cheaper to run.

Parts are going to be easy to come by for both models and they should have plenty of life left in them, so I'd say you're not going to go too wrong either way. :)
xijlix94
Stropper
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:56 pm

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by xijlix94 »

Thank you guys, bought a 1995 Pajero 2.8 TD 200,000km on clock, but the owner said he changed the engine, so the real km maybe lower. 3dr. Running good.
User avatar
pjb
Hard Yaka
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:37 am
Location: North Shore City

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by pjb »

Nice one Jerry. Post some photos...
94 Pajero SWB, 3.5 V6
xijlix94
Stropper
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:56 pm

Re: 1994 Pajero 3.5 V6 Petrol vs 2.8 Turbo Diesel

Post by xijlix94 »

Post Reply

Return to “Mitsubishi”