Turbo vs NA QD32 inlet manifold design.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:01 pm
Hi all.
Just doing some boredom induced forum trawling, and ended up reading a few peoples opinions that the inlet manifold off of the naturally aspirated QD32 engines is one of the better inlets Nissan made for a diesel. A google search shows me that the four 'runners' on the NA version curl up and over the top of the engine before merging into the intake tract horizontally right above the rocker cover, whereas the turbo version merges into one almost immediately before the head on the vertical plane. Both air intake pipes appear to split off into the four runners fairly evenly as far as I can tell (both about central to the four runners), with the biggest difference being the overall length of the runners; the NA ones are a lot longer than the factory turbo version.
Whats the story here? Are people having success running the NA manifold on a turbo diesel? Do the longer inlet runners prove beneficial? Just curious is all!
Cheers.
Just doing some boredom induced forum trawling, and ended up reading a few peoples opinions that the inlet manifold off of the naturally aspirated QD32 engines is one of the better inlets Nissan made for a diesel. A google search shows me that the four 'runners' on the NA version curl up and over the top of the engine before merging into the intake tract horizontally right above the rocker cover, whereas the turbo version merges into one almost immediately before the head on the vertical plane. Both air intake pipes appear to split off into the four runners fairly evenly as far as I can tell (both about central to the four runners), with the biggest difference being the overall length of the runners; the NA ones are a lot longer than the factory turbo version.
Whats the story here? Are people having success running the NA manifold on a turbo diesel? Do the longer inlet runners prove beneficial? Just curious is all!
Cheers.