independent Spring vrs independent Torsion

brakes-shocks-lockers-etc
Post Reply
User avatar
mytronic
Hard Yaka
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Gisborne
Contact:

independent Spring vrs independent Torsion

Post by mytronic »

Hi all

Can someone explain the real difference between the two.
As Beam axil is getting harder to find, is there any real difference between Spring and Torsion :?: As I see it body lift is one for the springs, but it is also limitted by the CV arm :?: and bump stops. So my reasoning is that A Zuk is as good as a Pajero say or even a Cherokee :!: :!: or the other way around
User avatar
WACKO
Pyro
Posts: 990
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Post by WACKO »

ouch... i can see a can of worms here... :lol:
User avatar
mytronic
Hard Yaka
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Gisborne
Contact:

Post by mytronic »

Not game for this one aye 8)
As yet I have not been able to get an intelligent answer over this question.
User avatar
DaveM
Hard Yaka
Posts: 3249
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Blenheim

Post by DaveM »

Torsion bars work by twisting action, so would have thought that the coil sprung ifs (Prado etc) would have better articulation perhaps?

What do you mean by body lift is one for the springs?
Last edited by DaveM on Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WACKO
Pyro
Posts: 990
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Post by WACKO »

personally i think solid axles are better but am still more than happy with my paj, so ill just sit on the fence. :lol:
User avatar
mytronic
Hard Yaka
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Gisborne
Contact:

Post by mytronic »

DaveM wrote:Torsion bars work by twisting action, so would have thought that the springs (Prado etc) would have better articulation perhaps?

What do you mean by body lift is one for the springs?


Yep, I see where I went wrong on that one. Sorry. Was thinking Zuk again with body spacers to get the tires under. My error.
User avatar
coxsy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 5200
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: mangere auckland

springs torsion

Post by coxsy »

I follow a safari around a lot in my first year 4wd , the torsion did its job but the safari with its coil spring just did it better thats why i brought one and retired the ute
User avatar
Petemcc
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1405
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Queenstown

Post by Petemcc »

i have torsion bars in my surf and dad had coils in his independant prado. prart from the prado being newer there didnt seem much diff. except with torsion you dont have to get new front springs to lift. though it does stiffen up a little
User avatar
coxsy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 5200
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: mangere auckland

springs> torsion

Post by coxsy »

will add with the mazda ute sitting on the flat it has 18mm of travel before bump stops , has a lot of downward travel, so everybig bump hole what ever that force is then applied to the suspension arms and mounts, not the springs taking the load, there is a limit to how long you can hammer something then it fails,
User avatar
rokhound
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by rokhound »

The main deal is traction.
With a soild axle, as one wheel is pushed up, it has to affect what the other wheel, (which is attached to the same axle) is doing. So piush 1 wheel up the other wheel will be pushed in the oppisite direction. The more compliant the suspension set up (be it colils or leaves) the better teh traction will be, because at least one wheel will be getting forced down into terra firma.
Ifs (independant front suspension) is exactly as it states. Each wheel is totally independant from the other. Hence if one wheel lifts, it doesn't put any pressure on the opposing wheel, and you can loose all front traction because the one wheel on the ground just doesn't have enough pressure down on it. Standard 4wd,s witrh IFS are pretty difficult to make articulate because of the length of the upper and/or lower arms, Driveshafts to the diff and 2 cv's on each side.
IFS can be made to articulate really well, but you have to start from scratch, and have a track width of a Mack truck. But if you want to really see it working, have a look at some desert racers from the States.

This is an overly simplified explanation of why the soild (beam) axle is the best option, feel free to add on/offer new opinions on this one guys.
Ugly is a state of mind..... and the state of my truck!
User avatar
SupraLux
Complete Bastard
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:00 pm

Post by SupraLux »

A torsion bar is just a straight coil spring... they are different ways of achieving the same thing. The limiting factor is the amount of travel allowed by the arms... which is going to be around the same amount regardless of model... although longer a-arms should equate to more travel... although again a narrower truck will need less travel to provide the same effect... although that will make it less stable (see the sheffield mudplug where pretty much the Suzukis fell over a lot (and H2O but lets not go there :) )... although... although... although...

My advice without getting to scientific?

Buy the truck you like, and SAS it :)

Steve
User avatar
H2OLOVA
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1153
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by H2OLOVA »

SupraLux wrote:(see the sheffield mudplug where pretty much the Suzukis fell over a lot (and H2O but lets not go there :) )... although... although... although...


Steve


I know i know....... its cause i'm a dick :wink: :oops: :?
***Got the balls, just ain't got the bucks***
User avatar
rokhound
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by rokhound »

H2OLOVA wrote:I know i know....... its cause i'm a dick :wink: :oops: :?


Don't be so hard on yourself Richard. You just aim to please the crowd :lol:
Ugly is a state of mind..... and the state of my truck!
User avatar
H2OLOVA
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1153
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by H2OLOVA »

rokhound wrote:
H2OLOVA wrote:I know i know....... its cause i'm a dick :wink: :oops: :?


Don't be so hard on yourself Richard. You just aim to please the crowd :lol:


Just as well i'm not a hunter cause my aim sucks :lol:
***Got the balls, just ain't got the bucks***
User avatar
albundy
Rolly Polly
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW, Australia

Post by albundy »

Totally agree with rokhound on this one. If I fail an obstacle it is usually because of the front end. That's why I want to put a mk/mq patrol front axle with 4.88 diffs. Mind you, if you aren't wanting to do serious shit 4wdrivng all the bloody time 8) ( hey boys) then I would probably not give a damn about the differences between a solid axle and IFS. Just reindex the torsion bars then wind the lift up. You will still get the same spring. Just remember that it is a long peice of steel rod under the truck that will get bashed, I have a slght bend in one from riding over rocks :wink:
Al
rain, hail, sleet or snow, we go!
User avatar
DaveM
Hard Yaka
Posts: 3249
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Blenheim

Re: independent Spring vrs independent Torsion

Post by DaveM »

mytronic wrote:Hi all

Can someone explain the real difference between the two.
As Beam axil is getting harder to find, is there any real difference between Spring and Torsion :?: As I see it body lift is one for the springs, but it is also limitted by the CV arm :?: and bump stops. So my reasoning is that A Zuk is as good as a Pajero say or even a Cherokee :!: :!: or the other way around


I thought we were only comparing between a torsion ifs and coil sprung ifs :?

No comparison really. If you go offroad, go beam axle :twisted:
User avatar
rokhound
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by rokhound »

Yeah Dave, I think ur right :oops:
Should have read the original post more thoroughly :oops: :oops:

And you are double right, IFS is IFS
No good for hard arsed shit.
Ugly is a state of mind..... and the state of my truck!
User avatar
mytronic
Hard Yaka
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Gisborne
Contact:

Post by mytronic »

Ah

Just as I thought No real difference in the scheme of things
Thanks for the discussion ,things are certainly clearer now.

Just a parting thought.

What happens as all the Beam's die as no one is making new? Or am I wrong?

Cheers
User avatar
DaveM
Hard Yaka
Posts: 3249
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Blenheim

Post by DaveM »

Unfortunately beams are a dying breed,with Defenders and Patrols being still available, but the Patrol's beam days would be numbered too.

As long as there are Steve's out there, you will always have the option of a beam axle, even if it's not from the factory floor :wink:
User avatar
rokhound
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by rokhound »

Have to buy a nissan pootrol
I think even 110 landys are or have alreday gone IFS.
Some of the new stuff has fairly good articualtion, (100 series, Rangey etc) But still difficult to alter at a later stage
Ugly is a state of mind..... and the state of my truck!
User avatar
turoa
Pyro Junior
Posts: 3112
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by turoa »

im fairly certain that defenders dont have IFS. They have solid front axles. The new disco has IFS but the series 2 disco didnt. Im not sure about the new rangys but the p38 rangy had a solid axle aswell.
User avatar
Cloggy_NZ
Texas Chainsaw
Posts: 663
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Wainuiomata

Post by Cloggy_NZ »

Going back to the original question about the difference between independent coils versus independent torsion bars....

Some things I can think off:

Unsprung weight versus sprung weight.
Unsprung weight is the weight of the vehicle not supported by the springs, diffs, axles, suspension arms, wheels etc. The less unsprung weight, the more readily the wheels will adapt to irregularities in the terrain (wether on-road or off-road), the easier it is for the dampers to control the suspension and the more comfortable the ride.
In a coil sprung vehicle, half the weight of the coil spring is generally considered to be part of the unsprung weight.
Not so in a torsion bar equiped vehicle. Here the weight of the torsion bar is part of the sprung weight.

Space.
A torsion bar can lie alongside an existing chassis rail and torsion bar suspension as such tends to take up less space than coil springs.

Suspension Travel.
Generally speaking, coil spring will ultimately allow greater suspension travel. Although other factors come into play here as well, length of suspension arms etc. And there are exceptions of course.

Cloggy
1992 Land Rover Discovery V8i, 5 speed, 12000lbs winch, Salisbury rear, 110 front, 65mm spring lift, dents in every panel, Rallywoods pinstriping.
Image
User avatar
zuky
Bush Crasher
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by zuky »

I thought patrols we're going independant all round :?:

It's only a matter of time before we're all driving suzuki's they still come factory Beam :twisted:

As for IFS I would put my money on coils. As you can get a longer spring in there so it'll be softer :) SO off road you'd get a better ride. There are some pretty good aftermarket kits around but mostly for coils.

Grab a locker and flex won't matter, cos if you've got a wheel off the ground you'll still have traction :)
Post Reply

Return to “Drivetrain / Suspension”