New WOF rules announced

Discussions concerning land access, DOC legislation and 4wd regulations
User avatar
Jerry
Yes Dear
Posts: 8325
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Wellington 027 479 2417

New WOF rules announced

Post by Jerry »

New cars will not need a warrant of fitness for three years, after an initial inspection, and cars registered after January 1, 2000 will have annual inspections instead of six-monthly ones under new rules covering WOFs announced today.

Associate Transport Minister Simon Bridges said the new system would save motorists time and money and would also focus on road safety.

The key changes are:

- An initial inspection for new cars, followed by annual inspections once vehicles are three years old

- Annual inspections for vehicles three years and older and first registered on or after 1 January 2000

- Six-monthly inspections for vehicles first registered before 1 January 2000

- Information and education to increase people's awareness of regular vehicle maintenance

- Extra Police enforcement activities.

"The new inspection frequency regime recognises concerns about older vehicles by making sure vehicles registered before 1 January 2000 remain on six-monthly inspections.

"The new regime also recognises that the quality of vehicles and their safety features and performance are improving over time," Bridges said.

He said Transport Ministry research showed the package of changes would benefit motorists and businesses by $159 million a year, and by at least $1.8 billion over 30 years.

This includes savings in inspection and compliance costs, justice and enforcement costs, and time spent by motorists getting their WOF.

Changes to the WOF system will be made through the Land Transport Rule: Vehicle Standards Compliance 2002 and are expected to be in place by July 2014 or earlier.

"Decisions have come after a great deal of work, including public consultation that canvassed a range of possible options. While many submitters wanted reform, others expressed concern about change," he said.

"We took these concerns into account in designing a WOF package that backs up the changed inspection frequency over time with other measures, such as information and education campaigns and more funding for police enforcement."

Work on the information and education campaigns and police enforcement activities, including funding details, would be undetaken in the coming months.

"These changes bring us more into line with other countries. New Zealand currently has one of the highest inspection frequencies in the world."

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/8228975 ... -announced
70 series prado (KZJ78) and 90 Series Prado (KZJ95)
User avatar
pressy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: christchurch

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by pressy »

all i see in that report is the police seeing more ways to make more money and not having to work for it. :evil: :evil: :evil:

would be better if they got out and look/find the shit bags taking out property take he have worked our asses off for. gggrrrrrr
Last edited by pressy on Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
skid
Tyre Man
Posts: 6311
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: WELLINGTON-0272417757
Contact:

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by skid »

Load if shite.

Will be lots more crap vehicles on our roads now.

When will the government see the bigger picture and address the economic shite state our country is in.

This will affect nobody as half of the country already drive round with no WOF or Rego simply because they cannot afford to make repairs
80 Series on 35" creepies, manual with twin factory lockers.
0272417757

*CHILLAX BRO.*
User avatar
petefj40
Ms Daisy
Posts: 4218
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: The Mainland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by petefj40 »

skid wrote:This will affect nobody as half of the country already drive round with no WOF or Rego simply because they cannot afford to make repairs


More like those peoples priorities are wack. Like they'd rather spend what little money they have on habits like booze, smokes n pot than getting a safe ride. And that's a fact! Try and change THAT!
User avatar
Dirtydog
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Gore, Southland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Dirtydog »

pressy wrote:all i see in that report is the police seeing more ways to make more money and not having to work for it. :evil: :evil: :evil:

would be better if they got out and look/find the shit bags taking out property take he have worked our asses off for. gggrrrrrr


i agree, what the hell do the cops need more funding for? their revenue gathering not make enough?
ActyonMan
Bush Crasher
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:45 pm
Location: Burnham, Canterbury, New Zealand

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by ActyonMan »

I don't think this is a good change.

A WOF inspection, for a lot of people, is the only time tyres etc get checked. Allowing annual inspections in 6 more months on balding tyres. How can that be good?

A vehicle in good condition, in my experience, takes less than 30 minutes to get a WOF and only the inspection fee. Where's the problem with 6 month inspection intervals?

To me this seems to increase risk to save a paltry amount/motorist.
User avatar
pressy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: christchurch

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by pressy »

ActyonMan wrote:I don't think this is a good change.

A WOF inspection, for a lot of people, is the only time tyres etc get checked. Allowing annual inspections in 6 more months on balding tyres. How can that be good.


Can see the police rubbing there hands together already. mmmmm more moola :lol: :lol: :lol: <---- The police laughing at us all. the w#%$@rs. and then they will complaint about how many accidents there are and then cut the speed limit to 80km open road to get more moola...... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

I feel a little better now ... :mrgreen:
Trundle
Hard Yaka
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: Taranaki

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Trundle »

This is just fucked , i own my own workshop and do wof's etc and the first i hear of it is on tv , the ammount of young guys with r34 sylines ,s15 etc and they get a full page every 6 months at wof time ,
Luckily i dont rely on the wof work i would say some workshops would get harmed from this ,
User avatar
Dr_PC
Hard Yaka
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Moerewa Bay of Islands
Contact:

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Dr_PC »

ActyonMan wrote:I don't think this is a good change.

A WOF inspection, for a lot of people, is the only time tyres etc get checked. Allowing annual inspections in 6 more months on balding tyres. How can that be good?

A vehicle in good condition, in my experience, takes less than 30 minutes to get a WOF and only the inspection fee. Where's the problem with 6 month inspection intervals?

To me this seems to increase risk to save a paltry amount/motorist.

These arguments were tabled to the government in many submissions, but one got the impression that the decision had already been made. The police that I have spoken to dont want any part of this. As they say they are law enforcemenet officers not mechanics
User avatar
tweake
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:00 pm
Location: start of northland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by tweake »

Dr_PC wrote:...... The police that I have spoken to dont want any part of this. As they say they are law enforcemenet officers not mechanics


and thats absolutely right.
police do not get any money from fines. they have a fixed budget and giving them more work means the budget gets stretched thinner.
its hard enough trying to get police to actually police the road in the first place.

in the long run this change may change peoples car maintenance habits. but in the short term its going to cost a lot of $$$ to change the culture.
User avatar
Moriarty
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1205
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: The newly formed Nation of OKATO

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Moriarty »

Not really germane to this thread, but....

Friend took a car for a warrant, FAILED because the window washer didn't work.
Why?
Testing agent: If it's fitted to the vehicle, it must work.

WHAT???

I must fix the radios, neither are working at the mo, and warrant is coming due again.


Comments?
User avatar
CLUMZ1
Hard Yaka
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:06 am
Location: Wellywood

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by CLUMZ1 »

Moriarty wrote:Not really germane to this thread, but....


what the #### does "germane" mean?
Image
User avatar
Sadam_Husain
Angry bird
Posts: 5164
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: WELLINGTON

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Sadam_Husain »

CLUMZ1 wrote:what the #### does "germane" mean?



Bobs pretty old he was in the war :P
User avatar
Dirtydog
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Gore, Southland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Dirtydog »

i failed a wof the last time due to no water in the washer reservoir...

girlfriend put it in, and instead of just putting water in it there she drives home and tells me, needless to say i then had to drive back to gore, after puting water in there just for them to say cool, heres your warrent sticker. fark sakes lol.
User avatar
GotFlex
Hard Yaka
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: Napier

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by GotFlex »

These changes arnt so bad? Come here to QLD in Aussie and you get get one road worthy when you buy the car and it never gets checked again till you sell it, of course you have to keep it up to standard or a cop can defect you.
Honestly a NZ WOF is only good untill it leaves the shop, how many of you guys change your big mud tires to road tyres at WOF time, or do your mods that require cert then drive it for 6 months till next WOF, trust me I know heaps of these guys.
I'm beginning to see a trend on this site of a lot whinging!
Maybe we could get the site changed to offroadwhingexpress??
SASed Isuzu Mu - hilux diffs, Rears up front, disc brake conversion, ifs hub swap, crossover steering, and legal!!!!
User avatar
bob_or_jim
Hard Yaka
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:47 am
Location: Sunny Southland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by bob_or_jim »

GotFlex wrote:I'm beginning to see a trend on this site of a lot whinging!
Maybe we could get the site changed to offroadwhingexpress??



Love it!!!! :D
User avatar
tallsam66
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by tallsam66 »

New rule is great ....if only my hilux was post 2000.
Most of this hype was whipped up by MTA using flawed logic so they could maintain there income $80M last yr from testing.NZ is now where other countries have been for yrs ...the sky isnt falling in, we will be just fine.
User avatar
yael
Hard Yaka
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: West Auckland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by yael »

Tell me if i'm being blonde here but 2000 and newer vehicles only need annual inspections where as 99 and older need 6mth inspections.. does this mean as soon as a vehicle reaches 13-14 years old it then becomes a requirement to get a 6mth inspection or is it just us poor buggers that happen to own vehicles older then 2000 models now that will just get penalised with the 6mth inspections from now on ???
If you cant beat us Gingers, JOIN US!!
User avatar
CLUMZ1
Hard Yaka
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:06 am
Location: Wellywood

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by CLUMZ1 »

I read it at 2000 onward are annual...

...not cars 13 years or younger.

So yes, cars older than 2000 are "penalized" Yael.
Image
User avatar
Dirtydog
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Gore, Southland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Dirtydog »

i wonder when they are oing to change everything again :roll:
User avatar
Suza
Hard Yaka
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:03 am
Location: Some where around the Lakes or on the Hill

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Suza »

The 2000 date is the example for this year, its the 13 years of age that is the cut off.

As far as safety goes MVC's that I attend are caused by either speed, driver error or booze/drugs.

My personal thought is that if you cant look at your tyres ect you properly shouldn't be driving in the first place, it wont hurt people to have to take a bit of responsibility for their and others safety.

Just my 2 cents
User avatar
MK1TNA
Hard Yaka
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:48 am
Location: Christchurch

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by MK1TNA »

Suza wrote:My personal thought is that if you cant look at your tyres ect you properly shouldn't be driving in the first place, it wont hurt people to have to take a bit of responsibility for their and others safety.

Just my 2 cents


But thats the problem people just wont do that unless they constanatly have someone standing next to them yelling at them to do it and alot of them have no clue whats safe and not and are not interested to learn. There is no solution to the problem thatl keep everybody happy
User avatar
petefj40
Ms Daisy
Posts: 4218
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: The Mainland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by petefj40 »

Sadam_Husain wrote:
CLUMZ1 wrote:what the #### does "germane" mean?



Bobs pretty old he was in the war :P


:lol: :lol:
xj
Hard Yaka
Posts: 2296
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Hamilton

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by xj »

Sadam_Husain wrote:
CLUMZ1 wrote:what the #### does "germane" mean?



Bobs pretty old he was in the war :P


Napoleonic War to clarify
/| , [____],
l----L -OlllllllO-

()_) ()_)-----)_)
KEEP'N JEEP'N!
User avatar
tallsam66
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Christchurch

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by tallsam66 »

Suza wrote:The 2000 date is the example for this year, its the 13 years of age that is the cut off.

As far as safety goes MVC's that I attend are caused by either speed, driver error or booze/drugs.

My personal thought is that if you cant look at your tyres ect you properly shouldn't be driving in the first place, it wont hurt people to have to take a bit of responsibility for their and others safety.

Just my 2 cents


Wrong !!!!
Vehicles up to 3 yrs old only need to have an initial inspection , then after that wof every year.
Any vehicle produced & first registered after Jan 1 2000 only needs WOF every year.
User avatar
coxsy
Hard Yaka
Posts: 5200
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: mangere auckland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by coxsy »

google search





Relevant to a subject under consideration: "that is not germane to our theme".

Synonyms

Relevant
89 safari, pto winch, 33x15 simexs. sliders,75mm lift . turbo intercoolered
User avatar
lincooln
Hard Yaka
Posts: 1251
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: Kaiwaka and Dorkland

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by lincooln »

stop bagging the ####### police. They have top do what they are told to do. They are already stretched and they have had quite a few budget cuts already. It is not the people on the front line or even some of the ones behind the desk, its the muppets in parliament and in the top offices that set the rules for the police.

Otherwise I don't care, all my cars are older than 2000 and most of the newer cars all have so many warnings etc when something isn't right that its not really going to change much at all.
Lubrication Specialist
Lubrication Engineers
www.lubeng.com.au lincoln@lubengnz.co.nz
User avatar
Mudde1
Hard Yaka
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by Mudde1 »

GotFlex wrote:I'm beginning to see a trend on this site of a lot whinging!
Maybe we could get the site changed to offroadwhingexpress??

Beginning????
Tony.
User avatar
slide
Hard Yaka
Posts: 895
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Nelson

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by slide »

Moriarty wrote:Not really germane to this thread, but....

Friend took a car for a warrant, FAILED because the window washer didn't work.
Why?
Testing agent: If it's fitted to the vehicle, it must work.

WHAT???

I must fix the radios, neither are working at the mo, and warrant is coming due again.


Comments?

Very good to ask. Any vehicle 1992 onwards must have washers. Pre 1992, nope. Not required. Even if fitted. Go argue it with your wof inspector. My bet he won't even know that regulation. But its in there. Lots of things can not operate if fitted, its whats called permitted equipment. Mandatory stuff must operate. EG a high stop on a 1990 hilux. If it don't work = no problem for wof as is not required. Again, look at regulations. I'm not saying this is good (as I don't agree with many wof rules), but its whats there...
Bonus is now wof VIRM is online, so anyone can read it up. Takes a bit of comprehension in some areas tho...
(http://vehicleinspection.nzta.govt.nz/v ... of/general)

Be interesting to see how long until changes are made in regard to altered wof frequencys
User avatar
GotFlex
Hard Yaka
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: Napier

Re: New WOF rules announced

Post by GotFlex »

Ha to all those who bag police I ask one thing who you guna call when you need help
SASed Isuzu Mu - hilux diffs, Rears up front, disc brake conversion, ifs hub swap, crossover steering, and legal!!!!
Post Reply

Return to “Land Access / DOC legislation / Regulations”